2 thoughts on “The company asked for the Taobao customer service chat privately to add a private WeChat order to place an order, what crime did it cause the company?”
Minnie
1. For any company, the customer group is one of the most important resources of the company. Employees use the company’s existing customer information to add the company’s customers to their own WeChat. This is obviously the infringement of the company. legal liability. 2. According to your statement of the case, the other party constitutes a civil infringement and it is undoubted that civil liability can be investigated; however, whether it constitutes criminal liability cannot be concluded according to the current information. Due to the strict standards of criminal cases, not all infringements can constitute criminal crimes. Please have a sober understanding of this to avoid unnecessary detours. 3. The crime of violating business secrets refers to the use of improper means to obtain, use, disclose, or allow others to use the business secrets of the right holder to cause major losses to the rights of business secrets. Two questions are considered here. First, whether your company has taken confidentiality measures on the customer list and other information. If there is no confidentiality measures, it is difficult to practice as business secrets in practice. Second, how big your business loss is, only major losses constitute a crime. 4. Whether you investigate the civil liability of the employee or criminal responsibility, you must collect and preserve relevant evidence, because the law must be evidence, and the evidence must be sufficient and solid, otherwise the rights protection measures or failure. The evidence of this case includes evidence and loss of infringement. 5. As for the plaintiff’s collection of WeChat, it depends on the specific situation, which cannot be generalized. If its original intention is to occupy the company’s payment, the amount is large and refuse to return, it will constitute the crime of embezzlement. Otherwise, it can only be identified as civil invasion and investigated civil liability. 6. In real life, employees use the company’s customer information to do it as a common person to harm public fertilizer and private. However, due to incomplete infringement evidence and poor infringement loss, it is generally difficult to investigate criminal responsibility. According to the practical experience of the lawyer, the lawyer believes that the case is not criminal responsibility, and it is recommended to directly file a civil lawsuit. 7. It is not too late to make up for the dead sheep. It is recommended that the company does more articles in protecting business secrets, otherwise things like this will continue. It as my answer helps you, I hope to adopt the best answer.
The expression is not very clear. If the company invites the authorization, it represents the company’s behavior. The improper behavior beyond authorization shall be borne by individuals. The improper behavior within the scope of authorization shall be jointly borne by the company and the customer service invited to the customer service
1. For any company, the customer group is one of the most important resources of the company. Employees use the company’s existing customer information to add the company’s customers to their own WeChat. This is obviously the infringement of the company. legal liability.
2. According to your statement of the case, the other party constitutes a civil infringement and it is undoubted that civil liability can be investigated; however, whether it constitutes criminal liability cannot be concluded according to the current information. Due to the strict standards of criminal cases, not all infringements can constitute criminal crimes. Please have a sober understanding of this to avoid unnecessary detours.
3. The crime of violating business secrets refers to the use of improper means to obtain, use, disclose, or allow others to use the business secrets of the right holder to cause major losses to the rights of business secrets. Two questions are considered here. First, whether your company has taken confidentiality measures on the customer list and other information. If there is no confidentiality measures, it is difficult to practice as business secrets in practice. Second, how big your business loss is, only major losses constitute a crime.
4. Whether you investigate the civil liability of the employee or criminal responsibility, you must collect and preserve relevant evidence, because the law must be evidence, and the evidence must be sufficient and solid, otherwise the rights protection measures or failure. The evidence of this case includes evidence and loss of infringement.
5. As for the plaintiff’s collection of WeChat, it depends on the specific situation, which cannot be generalized. If its original intention is to occupy the company’s payment, the amount is large and refuse to return, it will constitute the crime of embezzlement. Otherwise, it can only be identified as civil invasion and investigated civil liability.
6. In real life, employees use the company’s customer information to do it as a common person to harm public fertilizer and private. However, due to incomplete infringement evidence and poor infringement loss, it is generally difficult to investigate criminal responsibility. According to the practical experience of the lawyer, the lawyer believes that the case is not criminal responsibility, and it is recommended to directly file a civil lawsuit.
7. It is not too late to make up for the dead sheep. It is recommended that the company does more articles in protecting business secrets, otherwise things like this will continue.
It as my answer helps you, I hope to adopt the best answer.
The expression is not very clear. If the company invites the authorization, it represents the company’s behavior. The improper behavior beyond authorization shall be borne by individuals. The improper behavior within the scope of authorization shall be jointly borne by the company and the customer service invited to the customer service